Photosynthesis (Chemical change) Essay Example for Free

Photosynthesis (Chemical change) Essay Description: Photosynthesis is the process by which plants, some bacteria, and some protistans use the energy from sunlight to produce sugar, which cellular respiration converts into ATP, the fuel used by all living things. Plants are able to make their own food. Plants produce chlorophyll, a pigment usually found on leaves. It gives the plant its green color while being a key component in making food for itself. How can the change affect the health, environment or industry? Plants use the energy from sunlight to produce sugar. The energy and oxygen created by plants from photosynthesis keeps life sustainable on Earth. It is one of the many ways our world uses the sun as a source for energy. Scientists for years have been studying the blueprint of photosynthesis in hopes of duplicating its process. They are continually making strides toward unlocking the keys to reproducing this cycle. How can I maximize the benefits / minimize the harmful effect of the change? Photosynthesis is one of the most important biological processes on Earth. Life is sustainable on Earth because of this process. Agencies may form laws to protect the environment, and recycling reuses materials made from natural resources. http://www.ehow.com/about_5171907_effects-photosynthesis.html#ixzz2HNgzrqG3 Burning Plastic Bags (Physical Change) Description: Burning plastic bags has been advocated by some environmental campaigners as a greener alternative to burying them in landfill sites, as it is thought that they are not biodegradable because they have existed for less than a generation, there is not yet a definitive answer to the question of biodegradability. How can the change affect the health, environment or industry? It can  increase the risk of heart disease and cause rashes, nausea, or headaches. It can damage the nervous system, kidney or liver, in the reproductive and development system. It can also affect the central nervous system, causing headaches, fatigue, weakness, and depression. Burning plastic bags releases toxins into the atmosphere, creating pollution. Not only these people who are burning the trash are exposed to these pollutants, but also their neighbors, children and families. How can I maximize the benefits / minimize the harmful effect of the change? Separate plastic waste from other waste. Do not burn any plastics in your yard or house. Reduce wastes by buying products that can be reused or refilled. We can also recycle papers, glass and metals. http://www.wecf.eu/cms/download/2004-2005/homeburning_plastics.pdf Deforestation (Physical Change) Description: Deforestation refers to the cutting, clearing, and removal of rainforest or related ecosystems into less bio-diverse ecosystems such as pasture, cropland, or plantations. How can the change affect the health, environment or industry? Trees are necessary for rain. Tree cutting can lead to flood and deforestation, a transformation of an area from forest to terrain with little vegetation. Plants create oxygen and absorb greenhouse gases. The destruction of trees may, therefore, encourage global warming. Cutting trees can result in the loss of habitat for animal species, which can harm ecosystems. How can I maximize the benefits / minimize the harmful effect of the change? We should tell the citizens about the actual side effects of cutting down trees. To find the alternative means other than the use of tree for usual  activities like cooking, building and for furniture; Instead we are to use plastic and iron material for furniture and building purposes and also the use of gases for cooking. We can also create strict laws against cutting of trees and improper use of tree products. http://kids.mongabay.com/lesson_plans/lisa_algee/deforestation.html

The freedom of cyberspace

The freedom of cyberspace Discuss how the Internet, in its guise as ‘cyberspace’, has allowed its users to operate in a world that is seen by some people as being a new world of freedom and creative opportunities while others see it as a dumping ground for businesses and smut. IntroductionIn this essay I shall discuss how the Internet, in its guise as ‘cyberspace’, has allowed its users to operate in a world that is seen by some people as being a new world of freedom and creative opportunities while others see it as a dumping ground for businesses and smut. I shall introduce what cyberspace is and how it came to be, examine the main arguments for it being labelled as a creative tool that introduces freedom to the world, investigate the criticisms of those who champion cyberspace and analyse how both sets of arguments relate to ideas about technology, society and culture.   In my conclusion I hope to be able to offer an insight into whether cyberspace has developed into a powerful tool for creative freedom, or into a weapon in the arsenal of big business. CyberspaceThe term ‘cyberspace’ was first used by science-fiction writer William Gibson in his 1984 novel Neuromancer.   He described it is a futuristic computer network that people use by plugging their minds into it.   This term now refers to the Internet and lends a romantic image to a world where an almost limitless pool of information can be plucked from a network of computers and computer users around the world.   The Internet was originally developed for the US military but was recognised as the perfect system to transfer and share information for academic research.   The World Wide Web was invented by Tim Berners-Lee in 1989, with the first working system deployed in 1990, while he was working at CERN (the European Organization for Nuclear Research).   The introduction of the World Wide Web allowed the public to access huge amounts of data and it has now become an accepted way to receive and send information.   The World Wide Web is just one service that the Internet provides; a layman’s analogy is of the Internet being the transportation of the World Wide Web’s content.   With cyberspace being made up of more than 100 million computers in more than 100 countries it is almost impossible to fathom how much information there is available to the user.   New Frontier   Cyberspace has been able to offer its users and its contributors a vast arena to ‘play’ with.   The rules and regulations of structured information providers such as the press do not apply to most of the content available online.   This affords the Internet a creative freedom that has never before been seen.   In an article in 2000, journalist Mary Flanagan stated that: â€Å"Technology allows us an alternate space within which we can invent unique methods of telling stories, forming identities, and remembering.†   This alternate space that Flanagan refers to is typifies the romantic view of cyberspace; it is a world in which a person can break free from the shackles of the everyday world and become someone different where they are able to enjoy the freedom of creating a new identity, a new work of art or even a conspiracy theory that they would not have imagined constructing in the ‘real world’.   Sherry Turkle describes th is as â€Å"People who live parallel lives on the screen are nevertheless bound by the desires, pain and mortality of their physical selves.   Virtual communities offer a dramatic new context in which to think about human identity in the age of the Internet†Ã‚   In her introduction to the reader author Rosanne Alluquere Stone reveals that â€Å"†¦engaging in social intercourse by means of communication technologies has given me increasing opportunities to watch others try on their own alternative personae†¦ there are some out at the margins who have always lived comfortably with the idea of floating identities, and inward from the margins there are a few who are beginning, just a bit, to question.†Ã‚   This questioning hints at the notion that under a veil of secrecy the truth can be surfaced without retribution.   Perhaps the most famous advocate of this was Oscar Wilde when he wrote: â€Å"Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.† In this new frontier the Internet user can find information on any subject they wish to.   This information is not static like the printed words of a book found in a library, but it is â€Å"organic, open, ubiquitous and creative.†Ã‚   In the words of social commentator Annie Turner: â€Å"†¦it has turned into the eighth wonder of the world because it has not been regulated, because anyone can put up a website, because it can be all things to all people, because it has changed the way we work, are educated and play.†   The fact that content is not regulated attracts more people to it on a daily basis.   These new users can then become contributors by simple interaction; be it an acknowledgment of what they have read in a user forum (a dedicated area on the Internet where people can discuss any subject matter, originally called Bulletin Board Systems) to creating a brand new website dealing with the subject matter.   This process demonstrates the organic str ucture of the Internet and how it has become such an important source of information across the globe. The Internet allows freedom to share information and ideas.   The vast abyss that is cyberspace can be explored by almost anyone who has access to a modem and a computer (and more recently this can also include mobile phones, televisions and even refrigerators!)   People can add their thoughts and ideas to the Internet and these can then be shared amongst a mass audience.   This process of sharing ideas is the backbone of the Internet.   One of the contributing reasons for the popularity of cyberspace is the freedom to share knowledge with others.   This ideal has been argued against by groups that feel that the Internet should be regulated but a case for its defence can be traced back to the third US president Thomas Jefferson who wrote: â€Å"That ideas should be freely spread from one to another over the globe, for the moral and mutual instruction of man and improvement of his condition seems to have been peculiarly and benevolently designed by nature when she made them like fire, expansible over all space without lessening their density at any point, and, like the air, incapable of confinement or exclusive appropriation. Inventions, then, cannot in nature be a subject of property.†Ã‚   This was written almost 200 years ago and is still poignant today.   This freedom of information is the backbone of democracy (although it can be argued that this no longer exists in its truest from) and relates to the fluidity of the Internet. Another way in which cyberspace can be seen as a platform for creative expression is when it is used as a device to disclose information that would normally be guarded by political parties.   This ability to release information may be taken for granted in the West where tabloid headlines can seemingly uncover storylines that would be more suited in pulp fiction novels, but in suppressed countries such as Burma and China this medium has proved to be a tool to spread news that would never allowed to be broadcast by its governments.   It has been reported that China is the biggest abuser of Internet freedom.   The government has censored several hundred thousand websites and, according to Amnesty International, has jailed 61 people accused of using the Internet to spread anti-Communist propaganda.   An interesting fact is that Yahoo! (an American-based Internet company) has adapted its search engine to filter out content unpalatable to the Chinese government; subjects as inflamm atory as Taiwan independence and democracy will not be found on a network supplied in China.   In addition to this, Amnesty International has accused Microsoft, Sun Microsystems, Cisco, Nortel and Websense of helping authorities track down people posting pro-democracy and other similarly subversive material online.   CriticismsThe main criticisms of those who champion cyberspace are based on the content of what can be found online.   Some argue that there are subjects that should not be disclosed to the population whilst others complain that the facts are diluted at best, and completely missing in some cases. In an article in the New Statesman, Andrew Brown reported that: â€Å"There are two general truths about attitudes to censoring the Internet. The first is that hardly anyone admits to favouring it in principle. The second is that whoever you are, and however libertarian, it should never take more than five minutes at the keyboard to find something you believe should be removed from the net, and its perpetrators locked up in a criminal lunatic asylum.†Ã‚   This view is hard to ignore as any Internet user can find themselves in a harem of unsuitable websites.   These sites could include pornography, neo-Nazism, torture, etc.   However, the freedom of cyberspace protects these sites just as it protects the rights of suppressed citizens to air their comments.   The content of a website should be approached in a subjective manner and a liberal pinch of salt should be taken with each sentence.   The most substantial argument against the freedom of cyberspace has always been about pornography.   Pornography is the biggest generator of traffic on the Internet and the latest trend of providing pornography direct to a mobile phone has witnessed commercial breaks on some mainstream digital television channels flooded with semi-naked women selling images directly to the customer.   This saturation has thrown up the argument that â€Å"†¦the freedom the internet potentially brings is more under threat from some grasping commercial companies who provide access to it than governments who seek to control that access.† This threat from big business shows a shift in power over how business and the Internet work in conjunction with each other.   It was suggested by Manuel Castells only three years ago that: â€Å"It would not be fanciful to say that the Internet transformed business as much, if not more, than business transformed the Internet.† It is not all about the simple exploitation of bodies that has brought objections to the way that the Internet works.   Because there are no real rules or regulations to conform to there will always be content that is considered to be so inaccurate that if it was released in the national press there would be an immediate libel case.   This lack of quality control can hinder the savviest Internet user when a trusted source has included information that may have been gathered from a secondary, unreliable source.   Such an inclusion will therefore render that piece as being factually incorrect.   This modern take of ‘Chinese Whispers’ has infected a large percentage of information to be found in cyberspace and as such its opponents’ views of it being an inappropriate use of knowledge can be appreciated, and their calls to regulate its content empathised with. Technology, Society CultureThe technology that is now available to the public has grown in a remarkable way since the early 1990’s and this has allowed access to the Internet for the masses (but it has still to reach the Third World nations).   Ã‚  Castells realised the link between technological breakthroughs and the Internet when he wrote that â€Å"The culture of the Internet is a culture made up of technocratic belief in the progress of humans through technology†¦Ã¢â‚¬    A growing concern, and one that has developed over the last twenty years, is that it is the younger generation that have accepted this technology and it is they who can fully appreciate the choice on offer.   The ‘establishment’, such as governments, are mainly run by people over the age of fifty.   Their grasp of new technology is repeatedly outdated and the fear of ‘losing touch’ with the youth is highlighted by the need to own a website in an attempt to speak t he same language.   However, this language is updated on a daily basis and miscommunication can lead to a lack of understanding on both sides.   In an attempt to stop this from happening it is not impossible to see governments, or leading businesses, curbing the development of technology to have more control over its destination. Society therefore drives the world of cyberspace.   It appears in its current state because that is how it has been formed by its users.   The information that is available has been posted into the realms of the Internet by people like us, for people like us.   Castells writes that: â€Å"Technological systems are socially produced.   Social production is culturally informed.   The Internet is no exception.   The culture of the producers of the Internet shaped the medium.†   This cultural development affords the Internet to continue growing with any facet available to those who want it.   It has allowed for an intellectual, utopian culture where it is up to the individual to determine what they want to see and what they choose to ignore.   This is a culture in society which can grow intellectually, but only if it recognises that not all they read is true.   It therefore begs the question whether or not a society can blossom if a main source of information i s not monitored to be accurate.   Donna Haraway writes about the ‘Network Theory’,a theory proposed in the 1970s by the Nobel Prize-winning immunologist Niels Jerne.   He hypothesised an immune system that was self-regulated.   Edward Golub explains that the network theory â€Å"Differs from other immunological thinking because it endows the immune system with the ability to regulate itself using only itself.† This theory can be viewed within the structure of the Internet where the organic nature of cyberspace is continuously updated and added to by its own infrastructure; its users and contributors. Conclusion  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   The Internet is a vast and powerful tool and as such it is there to be used or abused by anyone with access.   The arguments that the Internet should be regulated are important and should not be completely ignored.   The power that some governments and big business corporations have over the flow of information is very real and this is something that should be examined closely.   However, picking out certain aspects from cyberspace to be scrutinised will open a precedent for all content to be regulated.   This could then lead to a misuse of power and the freedom of creative input could draw to a halt.   Haraway expressed her concerns about this exploitation and the ways in which new technology can be hijacked for anti-social use: â€Å"The new communications technologies are fundamental to the eradication of ‘public life’ for everyone.   This facilitates the mushrooming of a permanent high-tech military establishment at the cul tural and economic expense of most people†¦Ã¢â‚¬  It is my belief that the ability to take on board information and decide whether to accept it on your own terms is far more important to personal and social development than being told what you can or cannot digest.   As such I believe that the World Wide Web, the Internet, cyberspace, or whatever moniker it falls under does constitute a new world of freedom and creative opportunities and the fact that it is not regulated by self-appointed censors should be applauded and defended.   In the words of Rosanna Stone: â€Å"In the space between [immense threat and immense promise] lies the path to our adventure at the dawn of the virtual age, the adventure which belongs to our time and which is ours alone.† Bibliography Brown, Andrew (1999) The Limits of Freedom – Censoring the Internet and Offensive Internet Sites New Statesman (12 February 1999 Issue)Burton, Graeme (2002) More than Meets the Eye (Third Edition) Arnold PublishingCastells, Manuel (2002) The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society Oxford University Press Clark, Robert (2005) Time to Curb Net Censorship Support Telecom Asia (January 2005 Issue)Curran, James (2000) Mass Media and Society Arnold Publishing Danson, Lawrence (1998) Wilde’s Intentions: The Artist in His Criticism Clarendon Press Flanagan, Mary (2000) Navigating the Narrative in Space: Gender and Spatiality in Virtual Worlds Art Journal (Fall Issue 2000)Golub, Edward S. (1987) Immunology: A Synthesis Sunderland Haraway, Donna J. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature Free Association Books McCullagh, Ciaran (2002) Media Power PalgraveStone, Rosanne Alluquere (1996) The War of Desire and Technology at the Close o f the Mechanical Age Cambridge MIT Turkle, Sherry (1996) Life on the Screen; Identity in the Age of the Internet Weidenfeld Nicolson Turner, Annie (2002) Censorship and the Internet: Just Where is the Real Threat to Internet Freedom Coming From? Communicate Magazine (June 2002 Issue)Letter addressed to Isaac McPherson written on 13 August 1813 from Thomas Jefferson

What Means What :: essays research papers

Who Said What Means   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ask yourselves these questions before you read Kincaid’s â€Å"Girl†, Do you know what a housewife is, being a student or child, getting advice from an elder, and being called something that you are not? What is this story's about is it a story at all or just a poem in essay form? What kind of mood are you in right now to decipher this story in your own words? The story depends on the mood you are in and change the whole perception of this story. Then again, isn’t that what writing is about to begin with? Interpret the story as Mr. Hass told us to do, I did, but I analyzed it as a poem looking for an underlying meaning. There had to be much more than what there than what was told to us. I had a totally different perception. After the discussion, it seemed relevant for me to understand the story in a different way. But, I thought it was a mother to daughter talk. The â€Å"daughter talk† (my interpretation of the narration) was commands that her mom was saying. The advice told to her was not to become a slut, which was repeated several times in this story. But the question I ask you is, this present situation in the girl’s life, or was it a recollection of one that she had before with her mother?   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Is this story taking place in present time or in the past? It could be in the present with a young girl but I also came to the conclusion that this could be in the past and the italicized words could keep repeating in her mothers forgotten speech. Now is when she needs her mothers comfort and not only that what she wished at the time of the talk. In the other perspective though it could be in the present time and just be recalled by the narrator to opens one’s imagination to make them draw their own conclusions.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Is story a poem or is it a story, isn’t this story just a page with sentences making thoughts about a person to another person. Well that is what I got out of it and now I can only get more confused thinking of it, the story is so broad anyone’s interpretation could be perceived as correct. Not only that the story can change with each person, it also changes with the readers mood at that point time, not only that try to analyze it and your mind just wonders with the choices that Kincaid gives you. What Means What :: essays research papers Who Said What Means   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ask yourselves these questions before you read Kincaid’s â€Å"Girl†, Do you know what a housewife is, being a student or child, getting advice from an elder, and being called something that you are not? What is this story's about is it a story at all or just a poem in essay form? What kind of mood are you in right now to decipher this story in your own words? The story depends on the mood you are in and change the whole perception of this story. Then again, isn’t that what writing is about to begin with? Interpret the story as Mr. Hass told us to do, I did, but I analyzed it as a poem looking for an underlying meaning. There had to be much more than what there than what was told to us. I had a totally different perception. After the discussion, it seemed relevant for me to understand the story in a different way. But, I thought it was a mother to daughter talk. The â€Å"daughter talk† (my interpretation of the narration) was commands that her mom was saying. The advice told to her was not to become a slut, which was repeated several times in this story. But the question I ask you is, this present situation in the girl’s life, or was it a recollection of one that she had before with her mother?   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Is this story taking place in present time or in the past? It could be in the present with a young girl but I also came to the conclusion that this could be in the past and the italicized words could keep repeating in her mothers forgotten speech. Now is when she needs her mothers comfort and not only that what she wished at the time of the talk. In the other perspective though it could be in the present time and just be recalled by the narrator to opens one’s imagination to make them draw their own conclusions.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Is story a poem or is it a story, isn’t this story just a page with sentences making thoughts about a person to another person. Well that is what I got out of it and now I can only get more confused thinking of it, the story is so broad anyone’s interpretation could be perceived as correct. Not only that the story can change with each person, it also changes with the readers mood at that point time, not only that try to analyze it and your mind just wonders with the choices that Kincaid gives you.

Rhetorical Analysis of the Film, Waiting for Superman Essay -- Film An

Educational systems in America are impaired, and the very educators that are meant to teach are the one’s pulling it down. That is the apparent message that Davis Guggenheim attempts to convey in his documentary â€Å"Waiting for Superman†. He uses many strategies to get his message across. Some of these include cartoons, children, and those reformers that are attempting to pull the system out of the ditch that it has found its way into. He makes his point very well, and uses facts and figures correctly. He does leave out some of the opinions of the opposing views, but it does not take away from his point that the educational system in America is in need of repair. Guggenheim uses those and other devices to inspire action within the masses, and highlight a topic that has been recently shrouded by other problems our nation faces today. He also places blame upon the ‘system’ itself, many reasons add to this conclusion such as refusal to make change, with tenure being the central idea that cripples education. Guggenheim focuses his documentary on the teachers that make-up a large portion of the system. One of his strongest arguments is that the teachers are the problem, and the inability to rid schools of the incompetent teachers is the primary reason American schools are coming in so low in the international rankings. He also shares many facts and statistics that are staggering by their lonesome, but he presents them in such a way to exaggerate them by use of animation, music, and narration. Some of these animations add visuals when a complex idea is being described, such as the idea of the ‘lemon dance† or the ‘rubber room’ in New York. Guggenheim also takes the idea of tenure and uses these techniques to twist tenure into somethi... ... and our sense of guilt with his documentary. Which, while is not the most admirable technique, it causes the audiences to start thinking about what they are doing to help or hurt the educational system, and what our kids are receiving from the educators around them. This film is one that has faults, but is also very credible and a major wake-up call for those currently in power to make a change and help improve the schools of America, securing a better future for all. Works Cited Patterson, James. "Where are you Superman?" Rev. of 'Waiting for Superman'. (June 2011): Academic Search Complete. Web. 3 Nov. 2011. Schwarzbaum, Lisa. â€Å"Waiting for ‘Superman’† Rev. of ‘Waiting for Superman’. (October 2010): Academic Search Complete. Web. Nov. 2011 Guggenhaim, Davis. ‘Waiting for Superman’. 2010. Film.

Hand book customer service Essay

Policies: policies (structure, use, focus, customer requirements/expectations, product and service knowledge, consultation, confidentiality, customer perceptions and satisfaction, monitor customer service and satisfaction, influences affecting implementation, effective communication) Quality of service: methods of assessment; customer expectations; standardised procedures; codes of practice; staff levels (staffing levels, staff competency, flexibility, reliability and responsiveness) Evaluation: purpose; sources of feedback; accuracy; relevance; reliability; validity; methods of data collection; improvements; staff training and development Hospitality industry: industries within the hospitality industry eg hotels, restaurants, pubs, bars and nightclubs, contract food service providers, hospitality services, membership clubs, events 2. Understand the purpose of promoting a customer-focused culture Communication: types eg verbal, non-verbal body language, written; types of response; use; effect Customer: central role; customer service culture; identifying and analysing customer requirements and expectations; influences of service provision on customer perceptions Benefits of improved service: customer satisfaction, repeat business, improved reputation, increased profit  3. Be able to investigate customer requirements and expectations Requirements: sources of information eg customers, staff, management, customer records, past information Module Handbook C. Ugoji Sept, 2013 Page 2 Unit Handbook Unit 4: The Customer Service Primary research: primary research eg sampling, qualitative, quantitative; interview eg individual, group, survey, observation; contact methods eg mail, telephone, personal Secondary research: internal eg sales records, yield data, financial information, client databases; external eg government publications, trade journals, periodicals, professional associations, national organisations, commercial data Satisfaction levels: planning; strategy; assessment of options using researched information; role of the business and services manager; staffing levels; motivating staff; improvements 4. Be able to provide customer service within business and services contexts to meet required standards  Types of customers: different age groups eg the elderly, children; different cultural backgrounds; special needs eg physically disabled; satisfied; dissatisfied; under influence eg drugs, alcohol, medication Customer needs: customer needs eg products and services, urgent, non-urgent, special requirements, quality of service, value for money, cultural, social; trends eg fashion, ergonomic, equipment, training, products and services, consumer protection legislation Customer service: consultation; advice; personal selling; complaints procedure; reception skills; confidentiality Learning Outcomes: To achieve this unit leaner must: 1. Understand customer service policies within business and services contexts 2. Understand the purpose of promoting a customer-focused culture 3. Be able to investigate customer requirements and expectations 4. Be able to provide customer service within business and services contexts to meet required standards. Teaching strategies used: Following are the different teaching and learning strategies, a description of how they work, where they have been applied, results, and where to find more information from individuals, books, web sites, and other resources. Lecture Notes The most basic way of supporting teaching in this module – a place for students to access lecture notes. The main advantages are reduction in the amount of college Module Handbook C. Ugoji Sept, 2013 Page 3 Unit Handbook Unit 4: The Customer Service photocopying and students can access notes prior to lecture and prepare themselves. Presenting Lectures Displaying these lecture notes with the addition of projectors using power point presentation slides to visualize the information to the students. An increasing variety of ways are utilizing to reach students of all different learning styles, to help the students to understand complicated concepts and remember them better by using master graphic tools both on whiteboard and on computers. Interactive Tutorials A set of questions have been designed for each session in assessing student learning of subject matter using both paper based and computer based assessment techniques. The web and web authoring  Students are directed to use the advanced search engine to navigate the correct and legitimate information for their assignment. Different search engines compile information using different criteria and have access to different databases. Applying technology to develop students higher order skills and creativity to manage student learning activities in a technology-enhanced environment. Group Discussions The students will be give topics and some cases with the use of case study that relates to the topic covered in each session. There will also be a follow up on the discussion using group presentation and class assessment as the case may be. Summary of lecture For every session, there will be overall summary at the end teaching session. Attempting the passing criterion in class The student must attempt one or more learning outcome question covered in each session and the evidence will be documented

Ajinomoto Co. Inc. essay

Ajinomoto Ajinomoto Co. Inc. is a Japanese food and chemical corporation which produces seasonings, cooking oils, TV dinners, sweeteners, amino acids and pharmaceuticals. In particular it is the world's largest producer of aspartame, with a 40% global market share. When Professor Kikunae Ikeda from the University of Tokyo isolated glutamate from the seaweed and discovered its flavour enhancing properties in 1908. The next year, his discovery was introduced to the market in the form of the flavour enhancer AJI-NO-MOTO.The literal translation of Aji no Moto is â€Å"Essence of Taste,† used as a trademark for the company’s original monosodium glutamate (MSG) product. Thanks to the company's eminent status, its brand has found its way even to notable Asian language dictionaries as a half-synonym for MSG. Ajinomoto (Malaysia) Berhad started its business operations in 1961 as AJI-NO-MOTO ® monosodium glutamate producer. It is also one of the very first Japanese joint-ventur e companies to be set up in this country.Ajinomoto (Malaysia) Berhad has since grown into a dynamic food seasoning manufacturer marketing diverse brand name that is trusted by Malaysian for decades. Our AJI-NO-MOTO ® food seasoning is an indispensable item in almost every Malaysian home. Ajinomoto Group Philosophy We create better lives globally by contributing to significant advances in Food and Health and by working for Life. Ajinomoto Group Way Create New Value Create value with new ideas and continuous innovation based on unique technologies and science. Product value creation bolstered by technology, new dietary proposals) Pioneer Spirit Continue to constantly take on the challenge of creating new businesses and markets. (Adapt to regional culture and market conditions in creating markets) Social Contribution Accommodate social requirements with humility and honesty, with the objective of maximizing value for society through business activities. (Resolve social issues) (Impro ve the global environment) (Security and safety) (Trustworthy production) (Fair, impartial, transparent and simple) Value PeopleRespect the humanity of all the people involved in the Ajinomoto Group's businesses, and be an organisation in which they can grow and display their abilities to the fullest extent. (Provide a workplace where people can flourish) (Career development, support and follow-up) (Fair performance evaluation) (Teamwork) Ajinomoto Group Vision We aim to be â€Å"a group of companies that contributes to human health globally† by continually creating unique value to benefit customers. 1. To become a global group of food companies centered on the world's No. seasoning business. 2. To become a global group of amino science companies that contributes to humankind with the world's No. 1 amino acid technology. 3. To become a group of health-promoting companies with a scientific approach to good taste and health. Ajinomoto(M) Berhad Segment Analysis Ajinomoto (M) Be rhad (Ajinomoto) is a food and chemical corporation that engaged in manufacturing and selling monosodium and other related products. The company is divided into two major segments that publicly report financial reports.The Umami segment (Umami) comprises of products that are derived from the fermentation process such as Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) and related products. The Umami segment accounted for 70. 0% of 2011 sales, making it the largest Ajinomoto's operating segments. The Food and Seasoning segment (FSS) consists of products derived from the extraction and mixing process such as Industrial Seasonings, Tumix and related seasonings. This segment accounted for 29. 82% of Ajinomoto's sales in 2011. Others segment (Others) products sold by the company comprises of trading goods such as industrial sweetener, feed-use amino acid and frozen foods.The segment accounted for 0. 18% of Ajinomoto's sales in 2011. Condensed Statement og Financial Performance 2007-2011 | |2011 |2010 |2009 |2 008 |2007 | |Sales |316,165,220 |284,616,880 |243,838,799 |215,462,459 |190,628,976 | |Net Earning |25,870,244 |23,939,091 |19,072,212 |31,984,464 |18,670,013 |Total Ajinomoto sales increases over the last past years however its profitability has varied. Sales peaked at over RM316 millions in 2011 and has the lowest sales in 2007 at over RM 190 millions. Ajinomoto has yet incurred profit loss over the last five years. Ajinomoto's stock price has been steadily increases from RM1. 95 in 2007 to RM 4. 00 in 2011. Despite the varied profit earning and steadily increases of sales, Ajinomoto has continued to increase gradually from RM0. 79 in 2007 to RM 0. 15 in 2011.This is a clear indication of the importance that Ajinomoto attaches to the informal content associated with dividends: with the increase of sales, dividends will continue to increase. Industrial Analysis Bloomberg and Reuters have classified Ajinomoto as food processing industry sector. This paper will discuss in details Aji nomoto's financial stability compared with other companies in the food processing industry. The Malaysia Food Processing Industry The food industry in Malaysia is as wide as the multi-cultures of Malaysia, with wide range of processed foods with Asian taste.The industry is primarily Malaysian-owned, and estimated the present global retail sales in food products are worth around US$3. 5 trillion. It is expected to grow at annual rate of 4. 8 per cent to US$6. 4 trillion in 2020. The industry has more than 9000 processing factories of which 95% are classified as small-scale. Food processing companies are normally perceived as agro-based industries which have a strong backward linkage. However, in Malaysia, this is not the case as it is estimated that over 70% of raw materials used in the processed food are imported.Therefore, Malaysia is a net importer for food products. Value for imported food increase from RM17. 9 billion in 2005 to RM30. 2 billion in 2010, about RM82 million a day. The increase in 2010 was credited to Malaysia's climate, various economic factors, and higher standard of living. Financial Ratio Analysis Financial ratios for Ajinomoto for food industry are provided as below. The firm in food processing industry subset represent 16% of the total food industry sales of RM1. 972 billion in 2011.    |2011 |2010 |2009 |2008 |2007 | | |Ajinomoto |Food Industry |Ajinomoto | | | | |Amount |Percentages changes | |Other items of income |2,321,549 |4,066,021 |(1,744,472) |-42. % | | | | | | | |Items of expenses | | | | | |Changes in inventories of finished goods, |409,346 |788,248 |(378,902) |-48. % | |work in progress and goods-in-transit | | | | | |Raw materials and packaging consumed |(188,077,870) |(162,076,389) |(26,001,481) |16. 0% | |Finished goods purchased |(7,780,993) |(10,951,068) |3,170,075 |-28. 9% | |Employee benefits expense |(33,496,637) |(31,147,630) |(2,349,007) |7. % | |Depreciation and amortisation |(12,753,094) |(11,627,019) |(1,126, 075) |9. 7% | |Reversal/(impairment) of assets |3,204 |(20,360) |23,564 |-115. 7% | |Other operating expenses |(44,848,503) |(42,772,605) |(2,075,898) |4. % | |Profit before tax |31,942,222 |30,876,078 |1,066,144 |3. 5% | |Income tax expense |(6,071,978) |(6,936,987) |865,009 |-12. 5% | |Profit net of tax, represents total |25,870,244 |23,939,091 |1,931,153 |8. % | |comprehensive income for the financial | | | | | |year | | | | | |Earnings per share attributable to equity | | | | | |holders of the Company (sen) | | | | | |Basic |42. |39. 4 |3. 2 |8. 1% | |Net dividend per share (sen) |15. 75 |15. 00 |0. 75 |5. 0% | Income Statement – 2010 |Income Statement |2010 |2009 |Increase or Decrease During 2010 | | | | |Amount |Percentages changes | |Revenue |284,616,880 |243,838,799 |40,778,081 |16. % | |Other items of income |4,066,021 |4,387,766 |(321,745) |-7. 3% | | | | | | | |Items of expenses | | | | | |Changes in inventories of finished goods, |788,248 |9,219,317 |(8,431,069) | -91. % | |work in progress and goods-in-transit | | | | | |Raw materials and packaging consumed |(162,076,389) |(155,094,975) |(6,981,414) |4. 5% | |Finished goods purchased |(10,951,068) |(8,061,329) |(2,889,739) |35. 8% | |Staff costs |(31,147,630) |(29,049,802) |(2,097,828) |7. % | |Depreciation and amortisation |(11,627,019) |(9,534,228) |(2,092,791) |22. 0% | |Impairment of assets |(20,360) |399,605 |(419,965) |-105. 1% | |Other operating expenses |(42,772,605) |(30,427,115) |(12,345,490) |40. 6% | |Profit before tax |30,876,078 |25,678,038 |5,198,040 |20. % | |Income tax expense |(6,936,987) |(6,605,826) |(331,161) |5. 0% | |Profit for the year |23,939,091 |19,072,212 |4,866,879 |25. 5% | |Earnings per share attributable to equity | | | | | |holders of the Company (sen) | | | | | |Basic |39. |31. 4 |8. 0 |25. 5% | |Net dividend per share (sen) |15. 00 |12. 92 |2. 08 |16. 1% | Income Statement – 2009 |Income Statement |2009 |2008 |Increase or Decrease During 2009 | | | | |Amount |Percentages changes | |Revenue |243,838,799 |215,462,459 |28,376,340 |13. % | |Other items of income |4,387,766 |17,205,836 |(12,818,070) |-74. 5% | | | | | | | |Items of expenses | | | | | |Changes in inventories of finished goods, |9,219,317 |(321,473) |9,540,790 |-2967. % | |work in progress and goods-in-transit | | | | | |Raw materials and packaging consumed |(155,094,975) |(114,201,038) |(40,893,937) |35. 8% | |Finished goods purchased |(8,061,329) |(5,025,774) |(3,035,555) |60. 4% | |Staff costs |(29,049,802) |(27,117,151) |(1,932,651) |7. % | |Depreciation and amortisation |(9,534,228) |(8,740,933) |(793,295) |9. 1% | |Impairment of assets |399,605 |164,220 |235,385 |143. 3% | |Other operating expenses |(30,427,115) |(37,045,175) |6,618,060 |-17. 9% | |Profit before tax |25,678,038 |40,380,971 |(14,702,933) |-36. % | |Income tax expense |(6,605,826) |(8,396,507) |1,790,681 |-21. 3% | |Profit for the year |19,072,212 |31,984,464 |(12,912,252) |-40. 4% | |Earnings per share attributable to equity | | | | | |holders of the Company (sen) | | | | | |Basic |31. 2 |34. |(3. 2) |-9. 3% | |Net dividend per share (sen) |12. 92 |8. 92 |4. 00 |44. 8% | Income Statement – 2008 |Income Statement |2008 |2007 |Increase or Decrease During 2008 | | | | |Amount |Percentages changes | |Revenue |215,462,459 |190,628,976 |24,833,483 |13. % | |Other items of income |17,205,836 |8,044,056 |9,161,780 |113. 9% | | | | | | | |Items of expenses | | | | | |Changes in inventories of finished goods, |(321,473) |(448,494) |127,021 |-28. % | |work in progress and goods-in-transit | | | | | |Raw materials and packaging consumed |(114,201,038) |(103,743,602) |(10,457,436) |10. 1% | |Finished goods purchased |(5,025,774) |(4,871,823) |(153,951) |3. 2% | |Staff costs |(27,117,151) |(25,633,738) |(1,483,413) |5. % | |Depreciation and amortisation |(8,740,933) |(8,661,427) |(79,506) |0. 9% | |Impairment of assets |164,220 |(850,543) |1,014,763 |-119. 3% | |Other operating ex penses |(37,045,175) |(33,433,642) |(3,611,533) |10. 8% | |Profit before tax |40,380,971 |21,029,763 |19,351,208 |92. % | |Income tax expense |(8,396,507) |(2,359,750) |(6,036,757) |255. 8% | |Profit for the year |31,984,464 |18,670,013 |13,314,451 |71. 3% | |Earnings per share attributable to equity | | | | | |holders of the Company (sen) | | | | | |Basic |34. 4 |24. |9. 7 |39. 3% | |Net dividend per share (sen) |8. 92 |7. 90 |1. 02 |12. 9% | Income Statement – 2007 |Income Statement |2007 |2006 |Increase or Decrease During 2007 | | | | |Amount |Percentages changes | |Revenue |190,628,976 |170,592,741 |20,036,235 |10. % | |Other items of income |8,044,056 |1,852,434 |6,191,622 |77. 0% | | | | | | | |Items of expenses | | | | | |Changes in inventories of finished goods, |(448,494) |(2,525,867) |2,077,373 |-463. % | |work in progress and goods-in-transit | | | | | |Raw materials and packaging consumed |(103,743,602) |(90,491,939) |(13,251,663) |12. 8% | |Finished goods purchas ed |(4,871,823) |(5,084,454) |212,631 |-4. 4% | |Staff costs |(25,633,738) |(24,107,966) |(1,525,772) |6. % | |Depreciation and amortisation |(8,661,427) |(10,148,276) |1,486,849 |-17. 2% | |Impairment of assets |(850,543) |(1,145,779) |295,236 |-34. 7% | |Other operating expenses |(33,433,642) |(32,090,000) |(1,343,642) |4. % | |Profit before tax |21,029,763 |6,850,803 |14,178,960 |67. 4% | |Income tax expense |(2,359,750) |(841,246) |(1,518,504) |64. 4% | |Profit for the year |18,670,013 |6,009,557 |12,660,456 |67. % | |Earnings per share attributable to equity | | | | | |holders of the Company (sen) | | | | | |Basic |24. 7 |10. 4 |14. 3 |57. 9% | |Net dividend per share (sen) |7. 90 |7. 90 |0 |0% | Balance Sheet – 2011 Balance Sheet |2011 |2010 |Increase or Decrease During 2011 | | | | |Amount |Percentages changes | |Assets | | | | | |Non-Current Assets | | | | | |Property, plant and equipment |104,358,059 |102,765,733 |1,592,326 |1. % | |Prepaid land lease payments |0 |0 |0 |0. 0% | |Investment in associate |0 |0 |0 |0. 0% | |Other receivables |843,561 |1,061,831 |(218,270) |-20. % | |Investment securities |672,685 |798,813 |(126,128) |-15. 8% | |Other investments |281,000 |281,000 |0 |0. 0% | | |106,155,305 |104,907,377 |1,247,928 |1. % | | | | | | | |Current Assets | | | | | |Inventories |62,802,628 |52,255,273 |10,547,355 |20. 2% | |Trade and other receivables |32,410,933 |26,068,630 |6,342,303 |24. % | |Derivatives |36,263 |0 |36,263 | | |Cash and cash equivalents |68,767,151 |56,354,967 |12,412,184 |22. 0% | | |164,016,975 |134,678,870 |29,338,105 |21. 8% | |Total assets |270,172,280 |239,586,247 |30,586,033 |12. % | | | | | | | |Equity and liabilities | | | | | |Current liabilities | | | | | |Retirement benefit obligations |345,271 |466,710 |(121,439) |-26. % | |Trade and other payables |38,238,679 |24,617,997 |13,620,682 |55. 3% | |Derivatives |2,397 |0 |2,397 | | |Current tax payable |1,589,523 |151,171 |1,438,352 |951. % | | |40,175,870 |25 ,235,878 |14,939,992 |59. 2% | | | | | | | |Non-current liabilities | | | | | |Retirement benefit obligations |5,756,631 |5,295,024 |461,607 |8. % | |Deferred tax liabilities |4,051,039 |4,939,037 |(887,998) |-18. 0% | | |9,807,670 |10,234,061 |(426,391) |-4. 2% | |Total liabilities |49,983,540 |35,469,939 |14,513,601 |40. 9% | |Net assets |220,188,740 |204,116,308 |16,072,432 |7. % | | | | | | | |Equity attributable to equity holders of the | | | | | |company | | | | | |Share capital |60,798,534 |60,798,534 |0 |0. % | |Share premium |4,303,700 |4,303,700 |0 |0. 0% | |Retained earnings |148,553,371 |132,359,068 |16,194,303 |12. 2% | |Other reserves |6,533,135 |6,655,006 |(121,871) |-1. 8% | |Total equity |220,188,740 |204,116,308 |16,072,432 |7. % | |Total equity and liabilities |270,172,280 |239,586,247 |30,586,033 |12. 8% | Balance Sheet – 2010 |Balance Sheet |2010 |2009 |Increase or Decrease During 2010 | | | | |Amount |Percentages changes | |Assets |   |   |   |   | |Non-Current Assets |    |   |   | |Property, plant and equipment |62,661,795 |60,798,913 |1,862,882 |3. 1% | |Prepaid land lease payments |40,103,938 |39,510,974 |592,964 |1. 5% | |Investment in associates |0 |1,348,751 |(1,348,751) |-100. 0% | |Other investments |1,079,813 |1,123,377 |(43,564) |-3. % | |   |103,845,546 |102,782,015 |1,063,531 |1. 0% | |   |   |   |   |   | |Current Assets |   |   |   |   | |Inventories |52,255,273 |46,356,553 |5,898,720 |12. % | |Trade and other receivables |27,130,461 |30,099,502 |(2,969,041) |-9. 9% | |Cash and cash equivalents |56,354,967 |43,221,990 |13,132,977 |30. 4% | |   |135,740,701 |119,678,045 |16,062,656 |13. 4% | |Total assets |239,586,247 |222,460,060 |17,126,187 |7. % | |   |   |   |   |   | |Equity and liabilities |   |   |   |   | |Current liabilities |   |   |   |   | |Retirement benefit obligations |466,710 |320,578 |146,132 |45. % | |Trade and other payables |24,617,997 |22,857,239 |1,760,758 |7. 7% | |Current tax payable |151,171 |445,670 |(294,499) |-66. 1% | |   |25,235,878 |23,623,487 |1,612,391 |6. % | | |   |   |   |   | |Non-current liabilities |   |   |   |   | |Retirement benefit obligations |5,295,024 |5,052,251 |242,773 |4. % | |Deferred tax liabilities |4,939,037 |4,487,325 |451,712 |10. 1% | |   |10,234,061 |9,539,576 |694,485 |7. 3% | |Total liabilities |35,469,939 |33,163,063 |2,306,876 |7. % | |   |   |   |   |   | |Equity attributable to equity holders of the |   |   |   |   | |company | | | | | |Share capital |60,798,534 |60,798,534 |0 |0. % | |Share premium |4,303,700 |4,303,700 |0 |0. 0% | |Reserves |139,014,074 |124,194,763 |14,819,311 |11. 9% | |Total equity |204,116,308 |189,296,997 |14,819,311 |7. 8% | |Total equity and liabilities |239,586,247 |222,460,060 |17,126,187 |7. 7% | Balance Sheet – 2009 Balance Sheet |2009 |2008 |Increase or Decrease During 2009 | | | | |Amount |Perce ntages changes | |Assets |   |   |   |   | |Non-Current Assets |   |   |   |   | |Property, plant and equipment |60,798,913 47,657,260 |13,141,653 |27. 6% | |Prepaid land lease payments |39,510,974 |40,207,748 |(696,774) |-1. 7% | |Investment in associates |1,348,751 |1,348,751 |0 |0. 0% | |Other investments |1,123,377 |1,252,063 |(128,686) |-10. % | |   |102,782,015 |90,465,822 |12,316,193 |13. 6% | |   |   |   |   |   | |Current Assets |   |   |   |   | |Inventories |46,356,553 |32,383,255 |13,973,298 |43. % | |Trade and other receivables |30,099,502 |27,863,680 |2,235,822 |8. 0% | |Cash and cash equivalents |43,221,990 |66,193,647 |(22,971,657) |-34. 7% | |   |119,678,045 |126,440,582 |(6,762,537) |-5. 3% | |Total assets |222,460,060 |216,906,404 |5,553,656 |2. % | |   |   |   |   |   | |Equity and liabilities |   |   |   |   | |Current liabilities |   |   |   |   | |Retirement benefit obligations |320,578 |296, 972 |23,606 |7. % | |Trade and other payables |22,857,239 |28,230,809 |(5,373,570) |-19. 0% | |Current tax payable |445,670 |1,748,521 |(1,302,851) |-74. 5% | |   |23,623,487 |30,276,302 |(6,652,815) |-22. % | |   |   | |   |   | |Non-current liabilities |   |   |   |   | |Retirement benefit obligations |5,052,251 |4,461,628 |25,697 |0. % | |Deferred tax liabilities |4,487,325 |4,088,518 |5,451,058 |133. 3% | |   |9,539,576 |8,550,146 |24,612,917 |287. 9% | |Total liabilities |33,163,063 |38,826,448 |(5,663,385) |-14. % | |   |   |   |   |   | |Equity attributable to equity holders of the |   |   |   |   | |company | | | | | |Share capital |60,798,534 |60,798,534 |0 |0. % | |Share premium |4,303,700 |4,303,700 |0 |0. 0% | |Reserves |124,194,763 |112,977,722 |11,217,041 |9. 9% | |Total equity |189,296,997 |178,079,956 |11,217,041 |6. 3% | |Total equity and liabilities |222,460,060 |216,906,404 |5,553,656 |2. 6% | Balance Sheet – 2008 B alance Sheet |2008 |2007 |Increase or Decrease During 2008 | | | | |Amount |Percentages changes | |Assets |   |   |   |   | |Non-Current Assets |   |   |   |   | |Property, plant and equipment |47,657,260 |46,324,751 |1,332,509 |2. 9% | |Prepaid land lease payments |40,207,748 |23,081,794 |17,125,954 |74. 2% | |Investment in associate |1,348,751 |1,348,751 |0 |0. 0% | |Other investments |1,252,063 |1,134,441 |117,622 |10. 4% | |   |90,465,822 |71,889,737 |18,576,085 |25. % | |   |   |   |   |   | |Current Assets |   |   |   |   | |Inventories |32,383,255 |25,104,026 |7,279,229 |29. 0% | |Trade and other receivables |27,863,680 |24,590,686 |3,272,994 |13. 3% | |Cash and cash equivalents |66,193,647 |64,193,072 |2,000,575 |3. 1% | |   |126,440,582 |113,887,784 |12,552,798 |11. 0% | |Total assets |216,906,404 |185,777,521 |31,128,883 |16. % | |   |   |   |   |   | |Equity and liabilities |   |   |   |   | |Current liabilities |   |   |   |   | |Retirement benefit obligations |296,972 |711,923 |(414,951) |-58. 3% | |Trade and other payables |28,230,809 |25,619,622 |2,611,187 |10. 2% | |Current tax payable |1,748,521 |226,829 |1,521,692 |670. 9% | |   |30,276,302 |26,558,374 |3,717,928 |14. % | |   |   |   |   |   | |Non-current liabilities |   |   | |   | |Retirement benefit obligations |4,461,628 |3,822,256 |266,262 |7. 0% | |Deferred tax liabilities |4,088,518 |3,878,168 |4,671,978 |120. 5% | |   |8,550,146 |7,700,424 |31,126,024 |404. 2% | |Total liabilities |38,826,448 |34,258,798 |4,567,650 |13. % | |   |   |   |   |   | |Equity attributable to equity holders of the |   |   |   |   | |company | | | | | |Share capital |60,798,534 |60,798,534 |0 |0. 0% | |Share premium |4,303,700 |4,303,700 |0 |0. 0% | |Reserves |112,977,722 |86,416,489 |26,561,233 |30. 7% | |Total equity |178,079,956 |151,518,723 |26,561,233 |17. 5% | |Total equity and liabilities |216,906,40 4 |185,777,521 |31,128,883 |16. 8% | Balance Sheet – 2007 Balance Sheet |2007 |2006 |Increase or Decrease During 2007 | | | | |Amount |Percentages changes | |Assets |   |   |   |   | |Non-Current Assets |   |   |   |   | |Property, plant and equipment |69,406,545 |73,405,024 |(3,998,479) |-5. 4% | |Investment in associate |1,348,751 |1,678,751 |(330,000) |-19. 7% | |Other investments |1,134,441 |1,234,984 |(100,543) |-8. 1% | |   |71,889,737 |76,318,759 |(4,429,022) |-5. % | |   |   |   |   |   | |Current Assets |   |   |   |   | |Inventories |25,104,026 |29,511,903 |(4,407,877) |-14. 9% | |Trade and other receivables |24,590,686 |25,197,271 |(606,585) |-2. 4% | |Cash and cash equivalents |64,193,072 |30,450,944 |33,742,128 |110. 8% | |   |113,887,784 |85,160,118 |28,727,666 |33. 7% | |Total assets |185,777,521 |161,478,877 |24,298,644 |15. % | |   |   |   |   |   | |Equity and liabilities |   |   |   |   | |Current liab ilities |   |   |   |   | |Retirement benefit obligations |711,923 |444,305 |267,618 |60. 2% | |Trade and other payables |25,619,622 |15,548,449 |10,071,173 |64. 8% | |Current tax payable |226,829 |133,929 |92,900 |69. 4% | |   |26,558,374 |16,126,683 |10,431,691 |64. % | |   |   |   |   |   | |Non-current liabilities |   |   |   |   | |Retirement benefit obligations |3,822,256 |3,663,700 |214,468 |5. 9% | |Deferred tax liabilities |3,878,168 |4,048,857 |3,651,567 |90. 2% | |   |7,700,424 |7,712,557 |26,546,241 |344. 2% | |Total liabilities |34,258,798 |23,839,240 |10,419,558 |43. % | |   |   |   |   |   | |Equity attributable to equity holders of the |   |   |   |   | |company | | | | | |Share capital |60,798,534 |60,798,534 |0 |0. 0% | |Share premium |4,303,700 |4,303,700 |0 |0. 0% | |Reserves |86,416,489 |72,537,403 |13,879,086 |19. 1% | |Total equity |151,518,723 |137,639,637 |13,879,086 |10. 1% | |Total equity and liabilities |18 5,777,521 |161,478,877 |24,298,644 |15. % | Reference http://www. barubian. net/2012/02/rm92m-spent-on-imported-food-every-day. html http://www. scribd. com/doc/36423986/Food-Industry-Malaysia http://findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m3723/is_6_15/ai_105043862/ http://thestar. com. my/archives/2006/8/17/IMP3/chapter19. pdf http://www. ifrj. upm. edu. my/19%20(01)%202011/(38)IFRJ-2011-122%20Yodfiatfinda. pdf http://www. mida. gov. my/env3/index. php? page=food-industries http://www. miti. gov. my/cms/content. jsp? id=com. tms. cms. section. Section_63c203a6-c0a8156f-5cff5cff-cbccc275 http://malaysia. ahk. de/fileadmin/ahk_malaysia/Bilder/Others/Market_Watch_Food_Industry_2011_ENG_. pdf

Conflict between Macbeth and Lady Macbeth Essay

â€Å"Choose a play in which there is a conflict between key characters. Explain how the conflict arises and, by referring to appropriate techniques, go on to say how the conflict adds tension to the play, and whether is it resolved.† William Shakespeare’s shortest tragedy ‘Macbeth,’ charts the rise and fall of the titular character and his wife, Lady Macbeth. Macbeth is one of the kings most trusted thanes, a â€Å"worthy cousin,† but he betrays that trust and murders the king after being manipulated into agreeing to commit the crime by his ambitious wife. This conflict drives a wedge between the characters and creates tension at a number of points in the play. Eventually all of their treachery is discovered, and Macbeth and his wife both face terrible consequences for their earlier actions. The conflict first arises between the key characters, Macbeth and Lady Macbeth, when Macbeth arrives home from battle. After the battle Macbeth came across the â€Å"weird sisters,† who hailed him as â€Å"king hereafter†. His ambition is immediately made known to the audience in his soliloquy where he admits his â€Å"black and deep desires†, although he reasons with himself and comes to the conclusion that: â€Å"If chance will have me king, why chance may crown me without my stir.† However, Macbeth’s â€Å"dearest partner of greatness† is extremely ambitious and is already set on murdering the king so that herself and her husband can claim the crown and is angry when she discovers that he has had a change of heart. Lady Macbeth soon overcomes this, as she is as cunning as she is ambitious, manipulating her husband by questioning his manhood and calling him a â€Å"coward.† After the murder, Macbeth instantly regrets it and further conflict is created between the characters as Lady Macbeth has to interfere and plants the bloody daggers on the drugged guards, as her husband is too shaken to do it. Macbeth rambles that he has â€Å"murdered sleep†. She scolds him for being so weak, telling him, â€Å"My hands are of your colour but I would shame to wear a heart so white,† and that â€Å"a little water† will clear them of the deed. The two characters will experience a role reversal later on in the play. Although they have achieved their goal, Macbeth is still unhappy as he views himself as having a â€Å"fruitless crown†, as he and his wife have no heir. There is also tension created between Macbeth and Banquo, as Macbeth fears Banquo suspects him of the murder, as well as the witches prophecy that Banquo â€Å"shalt get kings†, which is heavy on Macbeth’s mind. To solve his problem, Macbeth hires assassins to murder his friends, as tells the assassins that Banquo’s young, innocent son should also â€Å"embrace the fate of that dark hour†. Macbeth does not consort with his wife about their murder, which is on of the early signs that their relationship is beginning to deteriorate due to the tension caused by the original murder. There is tension in the famous ‘Banquet Scene’, which is a turning point for Macbeth and the point in the play where he fully commits to evil. Macbeth’s psychotic break during which he see’s Banquo’s â€Å"bloodied† ghost causes tension as it is viewed by his royal lords and kinsmen and gives them reason to believe there is something amiss. Lady Macbeth tried to pull her husband together, asking him â€Å"Are you a man?†, again trying to manipulate him by challenging his manhood. Although this worked before, it doesn’t now. This could be due to the murder of the king changing Macbeth as a man, but murder is not new to Macbeth so it is much more likely that the conflict earlier on in the play has caused a loss of respect and closeness between himself and his wife. As the play goes on, Macbeth and his wife grow further apart. Macbeth becomes the one â€Å"full of direst cruelty,† who seems ruthless and remorseless and Lady Macbeth is the one who cannot have a peaceful sleep. This role reversal is a common theme in many of Shakespeare’s dramas. Tension is created as while Lady Macbeth is asleep, she imagines blood on her hands, saying â€Å"Out damned spot†, and reveals her and Macbeth’s guilt to her hand maiden and the doctor. Lady Macbeth eventually commits suicide, so the conflict is unresolved. Upon hearing the nears Macbeth simply says, â€Å"She should have died hereafter.† It is not long until he also dies, which is a direct result of the original murder of the king. In conclusion, the conflict first arises between the key characters, Macbeth  and Lady Macbeth, when they decide to murder the king but then Macbeth has a change of heart and has to be bullied into it by his wife. Further tension is created between the key characters after the murder due to guilt and the psychological consequences take a toll on Macbeth, as well as his wife, in different ways. Macbeth and his wife experience a role reversal and grow further apart until eventually Lady Macbeth commits suicide, unable to deal with her guilt and Macbeth dies soon after in an equally gruesome manner. The conflict is not resolved as there is no reconciliation between the key characters.